|
|
|
|
SEARCH EMAIL BABELFISH CONTACT US ENEMY MAIN CHEMTRAILS ISRAEL MARKETS NEWS RIGHTS ARCHIVES UFOS BEAST
Revenue Generation
and Slave Labor Scam
legal wizzards don't get it, the Uniform Commercial Code has been broken.
Billy-Joe..Mauldin behind enemy lines
I really appreciate the concern for our wellbeing demonstrated by persons like Jon, Mark,
Legalbear and a few others. If it were not for their concern I would not have come to know
about the Remedy and Recourse provided by the UCC at 1-207 and 1-103. I even had to go to
Andersons for a non-legalese reading of the UCC. These legal wizzards can not get it
through their mind that the Uniform Commercial Code has been broken. One only has to go to
27 CFC 72.11 to see that all crime is commercial. It can not be Law because Law does not
compel performance such as, no parking in handicap spaces or buckle your seat belt, or
don't go over a certain speed. (Note: The Motor Vehicle Code is Copyrighted!!) and cases
in Equity (civil) do not bear penalties!!
The Courts are not under Article 3, Common Law, or Equity or under Article 1, Admiralty
bet are under a Colorable Law Merchant Jurisdiction called Statutory Jurisdiction wherein
the Rules, Policy And Procedures are known only to Judges and Bar Lawyers. Whereby it is
impossible to prepare a defense EXCEPT under UCC 1-207 and 1-103.
The whole scam is strictly for revenue generation and to provide slave labor through the
"Corrections" process!
My hat is off to you Jon, Mark and others for keeping me informed of the drivel that is
being used to try and maintain the status quo!
I fully agree with Danny Mac's assessment below!
Billy-Joe..Mauldin
From: "Daniel V. III McGonigle"
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 4:34 PM
Subject: [apfn-1] The Uniform Commercial Code
True patriots:
Below is more Bar Association/NWO-drone drivel and misinterpretation of: executive
bureaucracy (commercial for-profit machines), the courts (more commercial for-profit
machines), and of the UCC (commercial-contract law).
This going-down-fighting Bar Association/NWO propaganda only proves the power of NWO
determination that the People DO NOT discover and implement individual REMEDY. They keep
directing us to the Courts and statutory law, while they know the Courts are rigged. In
1933 and
later, the Elite had to provide the remedy (though secret, undisclosed), because that
prevents them from being prosecuted for TREASON and getting the death penalty. The
non-disclosure can get them for FRAUD only.
Traitor NWO-drones are well-trained propaganda artists, ignore them. The good word is out,
just keep plugging away.
Jon Roland wrote:
From: *Mark Ferran mferran@nycap.rr.com*
I think that HONEST people will generally understand what the Uniform Commercial Code is
intended (by the legislatures) to apply to by making two simple observations. First, the
(9) articles of the UCC have titles indicating the specific commercial subjects they apply
to and generally
control. Second, honest people will take notice that the same legislature that has enacted
a UCC for the state has also enacted a thousand other statutes to deal with other subjects
(that are not controlled by the UCC). The following essay I previously wrote may be
helpful.
*The Uniform Commercial Code *
*[These notes were compiled by Mark Ferran www.billstclair.com/ferran
http://www.billstclair.com/ferran ] *
*The whole Uniform Commercial Code is published online here:*
http://www.law.cornell.edu:80/ucc/ucc.table.html
* *
* *
*Article 1. http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC1?
- General Provisions [Search
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc1/query=?realquerydlg]*
* *
*Article 2. http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC2?
Sales [Search http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc2/query=?realquerydlg]*
* *
*Article 2A.
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC2A?Leases
[Search http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc2A/query=?realquery dlg]*
* *
*Article 3. http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC3?
Negotiable Instruments [Search
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc3/query=?realquerydlg]*
* *
*Article 4. http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC4?
Bank Deposit [Search
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc4/query=?realqueryd lg]*
* *
*Article 4A.
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC4A?Funds
Transfers [Search
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc4A/query=?realquerydlg]*
* *
*Article 5. http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC5?
Letters of Credit [Search
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc5/query=?realqueryd lg]*
* *
*Article 6. http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC6?
Bulk Transfers and [Revised] - Bulk Sales [Search
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc6/query=?realquerydlg]*
* *
*Article 7. http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC7?
Warehouse Receipts, Bills of Lading and Other Documents of Title
[Search http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc7/query=?realquerydlg]*
* *
*Article 8. http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC8?
Investment Securities [Search
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc8/query=?realquerydlg]*
* *
*Article 9. http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/UCC9?
Secured Transactions [Search
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc9/query=?realquerydlg]*
*The UCC itself states:*
*"*Underlying purposes and policies of this Act are
* (a) to simplify, clarify and modernize the law governing
*/commercial/* transactions;
* (b) to permit the continued expansion of commercial practices
through custom, usage and agreement
file:///C:/Program%20Files/Common%20Files/Microsoft%20Shared/Stationery/1-201.html#Agreement_1-201
of the parties;
* (c) to make */uniform/* the law among the various jurisdictions.
*ｧ 1-102. Purposes; Rules of Construction; Variation by
Agreement.*
*http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-102.html *
**
*
"The use by municipal police and courts of US currency does not turn the operations
of the traffic court into a "commercial" activity subject to the UCC nor does it
turn a traffic case into a federal case) Kimmell v. Leoffler (Tex.App 1990) 791 SW2d 648;
(similarly, UCC is not applicable to traffic court; "First, the UCC is not applicable
to criminal proceedings. .... Moreover, the regulation of speed limits is specifically
authorized under [the State highway laws].") Barcroft v. State (Tex.App 1994) 881
SW2d 838." http://www.adl.org/mwd/suss9.asp
*
**
*The UCC has many subdivisions called "Articles" regulating various transactions
common in Business:*
*For example, UCC Article 2, regulating contracts for the sale of "goods"
states:*
*"*Unless the context otherwise requires, this Article applies to transactions in
goods
file:///C:/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc2/query=%5BJUMP:%27Goods%27%5D/doc/%7B@1% 7D?firsthit
;"
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc2/query=*/doc/{t2
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc2/query=*/doc/%7Bt2}?
"(1) "*Goods*" means all things (including specially manufactured goods)
which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale
file:///C:/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc2/query=%5BJUMP:%27Contract+for+sale
%27%5D/doc/%7B@1%7D?firsthit other than the money in which the price is to be paid,
investment
securities (Article 8) and things in action. "Goods" also includes the unborn
young of animals and growing crops and other identified things attached to realty as
described in the section on goods to be severed from realty (Section 2-107
file:///C:/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc2/query=%5BJUMP:%272%212D107%27%5D/d
oc/%7B@1%7D?firsthit
)."
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc2/query=[jump!3A!272!2D105!27]/doc/{@17
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc2/query=%5Bjump%213A%21272%212D105%2127%5D/doc/%7B@17}?
Article 3 regulates the use of Checks and other "Negotiable Instruments."
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc3/query=*/doc/{t2
http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/foliocgi.exe/ucc3/query=*/doc/%7Bt2}?
"The defendants reliance on Chapter 3 of the U.C.C. is misplaced; Chapter 3 of the
U.C.C. by its own definitions is only applicable to "negotiable instruments".
The complaint filed by the plaintiff is not a negotiable instrument and the Uniform
Commercial Code is inapplicable.
The defendants do not have the choice of whether or not to be defendants."
http://home.hiwaay.net/%7Ebecraft/AndraUCC.html
**
*The term "**Without Prejudice" as used in UCC 1-207 applies only to the
"Performance" of an existing Contract, or to the "acceptance" of a
performance by the other party to an existing contract. It is not appropriate to
ambiguously use the words "without prejudice" upon a contract you are signing to
enter into. To do so secretly at time of signing the Contract is Fraud, and perhaps
Larceny. **The Code section
states:*
"A party
file:///C:/Program%20Files/Common%20Files/Microsoft%20Shared/Stationery/1-201.html#Party_1-201
who with explicit reservation of rights
file:///C:/Program%20Files/Common%20Files/Microsoft%20Shared/Stationery/1-201.html#Rights_1-201
performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered
by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as
"*without** prejudice*", "*under** protest*" or the like are
sufficient." http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-207.html
*http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/overview.html#1-206*
In* *State v. Stuart (No.Dak 1996) 544 NW2d 158, a court pointed out that trying to limit
effect of signature on legal documents by adding reference to UCC sections, is frivolous
conduct.
In the context of performance of an existing Contract: "When a waivable right or
claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof, causes a loss of the right,
and bars its assertion at a later date" (UCC 1-207.9). "The making of a valid
Reservation of
Rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such
rights by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel." UCC 1-207.7
*"First, the UCC is not applicable to criminal proceedings; it applies to commercial
transactions"*
http://home.hiwaay.net/%7Ebecraft/Barcroft.htm
"I continue to receive e-mail, snail mail and phone calls from well meaning Americans
who are desperate for any relief from the unlawful activities of the IRS. I also continue
to hear from these individuals how they have all found the magic bullet in things like the
UCC argument or "all names in caps." I am quite unpopular in the
"un-taxing" and "de-taxing" circles of the cottage industry known as
the tax movement because I do not subscribe to all this gibberish, and in fact, I find
those who sell these fairy tales as reprehensible as the thugs who work for the IRS."
Devvy Kidd [Author of "Why a Bankrupt America" ]November 12, 2002
http://www.devvy.com/patriot1_20021117.html
There are a large number of sick people on the internet who promote the criminal misuse of
words and terminology from the UCC to situations that it has absolutely no application to.
These sick people generally have a total contempt for a Republican Form of Government
wherein the People
exercise the soveriegn right to prescribe the Law of the Land that they shall live under.
(See "Part 1: Law" at www.billstclair.com.ferran
http://www.billstclair.com.ferran/
) The sick lawless individuals who peddle UCC nonsense belong in prison, and indeed, many
of them go there.
*"Back in the early nineties, an Oregon patriot promoted the theory that
"commercial law" was the foundation for all law around the world. ...
I obtained his memo regarding this argument and went to the law library. His contention
that this "principle" manifested itself in the law was wrong; I could find
nothing which supported this argument. This theory was a complete fabrication.
One of the most recent prosecutions of someone for using one of Leroy's drafts is Pete
Stern, a patriot from North Carolina.
Pete has been one of the most vocal advocates of the UCC argument, "we are
Brits," nom de guerre, etc. While I like Pete, still he has followed crazy arguments.
Pete's federal criminal case was filed in the Western District of North Carolina and he
was convicted."*
http://home.hiwaay.net/%7Ebecraft/UCC.htm
**
Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code provides as follows:
"Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the
United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick,
scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements
or representations, or
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false,
fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than five years, or both."
**
*"The UCC argument is one of the most legally baseless ideas I have ever encountered,
yet organizations like "Wrong Way Law" and people like Jack Smith continue to
promote it [for their own Profit]."*
http://home.hiwaay.net/%7Ebecraft/UCC.htm
See also, Patriots for Profit:
"A strong belief that others are "getting away with it." The
"patriot" movement has a currency of ideas whose most valued specie is
conspiracy.
Thus "patriots" are susceptible to claims that these secrets have been
discovered and are now available--for a price.
It is not surprising to find, then, that the people who can exploit the community most
effectively tend to come from the community itself. They are the ones familiar with the
vulnerabilities of the "patriot" movement, who can come and go in
"patriot" circles, who can "talk the talk."
"Patriots for profit" are people who exploit the "patriot" movement
for personal gain. While some may do so cynically, believing little or nothing of what
they say, a great many of them are actually sincere in their anti-government views (and
often have a record of anti-government activity). They simply are not averse to dipping
into the pockets of their fellow "patriots" for a little quick cash."
http://www.adl.org/mwd/profit.asp
The UCC Argument: It is Crazy!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ice-bucket/message/586
UCC Myths Debunked:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ice-bucket/message/586
http://iresist.com/ice/failedarguments.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ice-bucket/message/717
The " 'UCC' is the Uniform Commercial Code, a body of laws relating to financial and
business transactions, adopted by all 50 states."
http://www.adl.org/mwd/suss1.asp
The following is the uniform reaction of the Courts of the states and of the United States
to imbicilic attempts of ignorant people to disregard the Constitution and the Laws of the
State/USA by trying to fit every random legal issue within the narrow purposes of the UCC:
"Attempting to impose UCC provisions about "presentment", refusal, demur,
default, etc to correspondence with the IRS; "the UCC would be inapplicable because
the operation of the IRS is a sovereign function and note a commercial operation....the
Uniform Commercial Code ... is clearly not applicable to the IRS's summonses")
Holling v. US (ED Mich unpub 11/27/95) 76 AFTR2d 6968, magistrate's recommendation (ED
Mich unpub 2/6/96) 77 AFTR2d 1052, */sanctions imposed/* (Ed Mich 5/17/96) 934 F.Supp 251;
similarly US v. Andra (D Ida 1996) 923 F.Supp 157; similarly US v. Van Skiver (D Kan unpub
12/13/90) 71A AFTR2d 4063, 91 USTC para 50017 aff'd US v. Kettler [& Van Skiver](10th
Cir unpub 6/3/91) 934 F2d 326(t); (held that IRS operations are not "commercial"
nor are IRS documents or court documents "commercial paper" and therefore */UCC
provisions cannot be applied/* /*to them)*/ US v. Trowbridge (D. Ida unpub 9/13/93) aff'd
(9th Cir 12/13/94) 43 F3d 1480(t); similarly Wesselman v. CIR (2/28/96) TC Memo 1996-85;
ditto (perp tried to impose UCC provisions about accord & satisfaction by partial
payment upon debt to IRS; "However, the US Govt, as a sovereign, is not bound by such
State statutes as the UCC.") Bear v. CIR (12/3/92) TC Memo 1992-690 aff'd (9th Cir
3/24/94) 19 F3d 26(t), 73 AFTR2d 1611; ditto US v. Stoecklin (MD Fla 1994) 848 F.Supp
1521; similarly Brandt v. CIR (9/7/93) TC Memo 1993-411; similarly (IRS tax liens are not
"commercial" and therefore not subject to UCC requirements but are covered by
the Uniform Federal Tax Lien Registration Act, adopted by about 40 states) In re Bertelt
(Bankr. MD Fla 1996) 206 Bankr.Rptr 579; similarly Watts v. IRS (D NJ 1996) 925 F.Supp
271; similarly (court papers issued in an IRS case are not commercial or negotiable
instruments and the use of UCC formulae is inapplicable) US v. Andra (D Ida 1996) 923
F.Supp 157; ... (perp demanded that court invoke the War Powers Act to prevent the IRS
from operating, and wanted IRS employees "deported" as foreign agents) Green v.
Winkler (SD Fla unpub 12/5/96) 78 AFTR2d 7630; (perp tried to bring in Latin teacher to
testify that the words of the Sixteenth Amendment meant something exotic); Rowlee v. CIR
(6/15/83) 80 TC 1111; ... (*/sent back numerous parking tickets marked "refused for
cause without dishonor" and was thereafter surprised when the Highway Patrol towed
his truck away/*) Fenili v. Calif. Dept of Motor Vehicles (ND Cal unpub 6/16/98)
See also: "the bizarre notion that ... that the government went bankrupt when it went
off the gold standard"
http://www.adl.org/mwd/redemption.asp
See also:
*DESTROYED ARGUMENTS*
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/deadissues.htm
http://home.hiwaay.net/%7Ebecraft/deadissues.htm
http://usa-the-republic.com/jurisprudentia/defeated-arguments.html
http://freedomlaw.com/dismyths.html
http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/
Renowned constitutional Attorney Larry Becraft calls "redemption" program crazy:
http://proliberty.com/observer/19991005.htm
mailto:256-533-2535becraft@hiwaay.net
By rejecting Rational thoughts of Rational People, you condemn yourself to repeat the
failures of a Legion of other ignorant people who shared your Delusions.
See: http://www.commonlawvenue.com/Documents_CaseLaw/AntiGovHndbk/AntiGovHBTOC.htm
and: http://www.adl.org/mwd/sussman.doc
Call Spinner anytime to find out how to receive God's Free Gift of eternal life 850 593 0103 or Click Here
SEARCH
EMAIL BABELFISH CONTACT US ENEMY MAIN CHEMTRAILS ISRAEL MARKETS NEWS RIGHTS ARCHIVES UFOS BEAST
