|
|
|
|
SEARCH EMAIL BABELFISH CONTACT US ENEMY MAIN CHEMTRAILS ISRAEL MARKETS NEWS RIGHTS ARCHIVES UFOS BEAST
America ‘Pearl
Harbored’
Fanatical War-hawks Drafted Blueprint for Bloody U.S. World Domination Years Ago
The cabal of war fanatics advising the White House secretly planned a
“transformation” of defense policy years ago, calling for war against Iraq and
huge increases in military spending. A “catalyzing event — like a new Pearl
Harbor”—was seen as necessary to bring this about.
Exclusive to American Free Press
By Christopher Bollyn
The huge increases in U.S. military spending that have occurred since the terror attacks
of Sept. 11, 2001, were planned before President George W. Bush was elected by the same
men who are pushing the administration’s “war on terrorism” and the
invasion and occupation of Iraq.
Billions of dollars in additional defense spending are but the first step in the
group’s long-term plan to transform the U.S. military into a global army enforcing a
terroristic and bloody Pax Americana around the world.
A neo-conservative Washington-based organization known as the Project for the New American
Century (PNAC), funded by three foundations closely tied to Persian Gulf oil and weapons
and defense industries, drafted the war plan for U.S. global domination through military
power.
One of the organization’s documents clearly shows that Bush and his most senior
cabinet members had already planned an attack on Iraq before he took power in January
2001.
The PNAC was founded in the spring of 1997 by the well-known Zionist neo-conservatives
Robert Kagan and William Kristol of The Weekly Standard.
The PNAC is part of the New Citizenship Project, whose chairman is also William Kristol,
and is described as “a non-profit, educational organization whose goal is to promote
American global leadership.”
Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush, and Paul Wolfowitz signed a Statement of
Principles of the PNAC on June 3, 1997, along with many of the other current members of
Bush’s “war cabinet.”
Wolfowitz was one of the directors of PNAC until he joined the Bush administration.
The group’s essential demand was for hefty increases in defense spending. “We
need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global
responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future,” the
statement’s first principle reads.
The increase in defense spending is to bring about two of the other principles: “to
challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values” and “to accept
responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international
order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.”
A subsequent PNAC plan entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies,
Forces and Resources for a New Century,” reveals that the current members of
Bush’s cabinet had already planned, before the 2000 presidential election, to take
military control of the Gulf region whether Saddam Hussein is in power or not.
The 90-page PNAC document from September 2000 says: “The United States has for
decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the
unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a
substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of
Saddam Hussein.”
“Even should Saddam pass from the scene,” the plan says U.S. military bases in
Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain, despite domestic opposition in the Gulf states to the
permanent stationing of U.S. troops. Iran, it says, “may well prove as large a threat
to U.S. interests as Iraq has.”
A “core mission” for the transformed U.S. military is to “fight and
decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars,” according to the PNAC.
The strategic “transformation” of the U.S. military into an imperialistic force
of global domination would require a huge increase in defense spending to “a minimum
level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion
to total defense spending annually,” the PNAC plan said.
“The process of transformation,” the plan said, “is likely to be a long
one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.”
American Free Press asked Christopher Maletz, assistant director of the PNAC about what
was meant by the need for “a new Pearl Harbor.”
“They needed more money to up the defense budget for raises, new arms, and future
capabilities,” Maletz said. “Without some disaster or catastrophic event”
neither the politicians nor the military would have approved, Maletz said.
The “new Pearl Harbor,” in the form of the terror attacks of Sept. 11, provided
the necessary catalyst to put the global war plan into effect. Congress quickly allocated
$40 billion to fund the “war on terrorism” shortly after 9-11.
A Pentagon spokesman told AFP that $17.5 billion of that initial allocation went to
defense.
The U.S. defense budget for 2002, including a $14.5 billion supplement, came to $345.7
billion, a nearly 12 percent increase over the 2001 defense budget.
Similar significant increases in defense spending are planned for 2003 (to $365 billion)
and 2004 (to at least $378 billion) in line with the PNAC plan.
Veteran journalist John Pilger recently wrote about one of PNAC’s founding members,
Richard Perle: “I interviewed Perle when he was advising Reagan, and when he spoke
about ‘total war,’ I mistakenly dismissed him as mad,” Pilger wrote.
“He recently used the term again in describing America’s ‘war on
terror.’ ‘No stages,’ he said. ‘This is total war. We are fighting a
variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are
going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq . . . this is entirely the wrong way to go
about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and
we don’t try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war . . . our
children will sing great songs about us years from now.’ ”
“This is a blueprint for U.S. world domination—a new world order of their
making,” Tam Dalyell, British parliamentarian and critic of the war policy from the
Labor Party said. “These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to
control the world.
“This is garbage from think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks,” Dalyell said,
“men who have never seen the horror of war but are in love with the idea of war.
American Free Press
1433 Pennsylvania Ave. SE
Washington, D.C. 20003
202-544-5977
1-888-699-NEWS (6397)
www.americanfreepress.net
Call Spinner anytime to find out how to receive God's Free Gift of eternal life 850 593 0103 or Click Here
SEARCH
EMAIL BABELFISH CONTACT US ENEMY MAIN CHEMTRAILS ISRAEL MARKETS NEWS RIGHTS ARCHIVES UFOS BEAST
