![]()
THE ENEMY IS INSIDE THE GATES
by Colonel Donn de Grand Pré (US Army - Ret.)
: A dedicated group of experienced civilian and military pilots,
: including combat fighter pilots and commercial airline
: captains, just finished a marathon 72 hours of non-stop
: briefings and debate over the current crisis evolving from
: the use of commercial aircraft as cruise missiles against
: the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 11 September.
: The so-called terrorist attack was in fact a superbly executed
: military operation against the United States, requiring the
: utmost professional military skill in command,
: communications and control. It was flawless in timing, in
: the choice of selected aircraft to be used as guided
: missiles, and in the coordinated delivery of those missiles
: to their pre-selected targets.
: As a tactical military exercise against two significant
: targets (world financial center and the citadel of world
: strategic military planning), the attack, from a
: psychological impact on the American public, equaled the
: Japanese "surprise" attack on Pearl Harbor 7 Dec
: 1941.
: The over-riding question: If we are at war, who is the enemy?
: The group determined that the enemy is within the gates, that
: he has infiltrated into the highest policy-making positions
: at the Federal level, and has absolute control, not only of
: the purse strings, but of the troop build-up and deployment
: of our military forces, including active, reserve and
: National Guard units.
: PRELUDE TO PANIC
: The 9-11 activity and horrific destruction of US property and
: lives was intentionally meant to trigger a psychological
: and patriotic reaction on the part of the US citizens,
: which is paving the way for "combined UN
: activity" (using the fig leaf of NATO) for striking
: key targets in both the Middle East/ South Asia and the
: Balkans. The goal continues to be ultimate destruction of
: all national sovereignty and establishment of a global
: government.
: The trigger for the 9-11 activity was the imminent and
: unstoppable world-wide financial collapse, which can only
: be prevented (temporarily) by a major war, perhaps to
: become known as WW 111. To bring it off (one more time),
: martial law will probably be imposed in the United States.
: In each of the major wars of the 20th century, the financial
: manipulators (located in the City of London and New York
: City) had placed the US (and much of the Western world) in
: a monetary expansion mode, followed by an ever-tightening
: vice of a gigantic credit squeeze.
We now have two ongoing
: and tightly controlled simultaneous events (emanating from
: the two symbolic targets of 911: 1) Alan Greenspan, Fed
: chairman, promising to flood the market with up to $200
: billion in FRNs and to further lower interest rates, thus
: bringing about hyperinflation and dollar devaluation.
Much of these multi billions in largesse will be dumped into the
: coffers of Wall Street, Defense, bankrupt airlines,
: insurance companies and into the willing arms of
: debt-ridden third-world countries in the form of debt
: repudiation (forgiveness). Call it bribery, in order to get
: these often reluctant nations to join our coalition of
: "freedom fighters" in "the war against
: terrorism".
: 2) Paul Wolfowitz, deputy Defense secretary, promised that the
: US will launch "sustained military strikes against
: those behind the terrorist attacks on New York and
: Washington". He said that the "military
: retaliation would continue until the roots of terrorism are
: destroyed."
: This bit of saber rattling was seconded by select NATO allies
: (especially Britain), and by our chief ally in the Middle
: East, Ariel Sharon, while Secretary
: of Defense Don Rumsfeld, with the blessings of Pres. Bush
: 11, is activating thousands of national guard and
: reservists, not only to guard the vulnerable airports, but
: to do fly-overs of our Nation's capital in F16s from the
: North Dakota Air Guard. Other National Guard units are
: being jockeyed into potential combat "hot spots"
: throughout the Middle East/South Asia and the Balkans.
: WHO IS THE ENEMY?
: Following is a summary of the near-unanimous views of the
: assembled military and civilian pilots concerning certain
: critical factors relating to the WTC/Pentagon hit of 9-11:
: Troubling questions arose about the alleged pilot-hijackers
: of the four aircraft, who were supposedly trained on Cessna
: aircraft over the past year at fields in Florida and
: Oklahoma. One General officer remarked, "I seriously
: question whether these novices could have located a target
: dead-on 200 miles removed from takeoff point...-- much less
: controlled the flight and mastered the intricacies of 11FR
: (instrument flight rules) -- and all accomplished in 45
: minutes."
: The extremely skillful maneuvering of the three aircraft at
: near mach speeds, each unerringly hitting their targets,
: was superb. As one Air Force officer -- a veteran of over
: 100 sorties over North Vietnam -- explained, "Those
: birds (commercial airliners) either had a crack fighter
: pilot in the left seat, or they were being maneuvered by
: remote control."
: Another pilot warned that "we had better consider whether
: electro-magnetic pulse or radio frequency weapons were used
: from a command and control platform hovering over the
: Eastern Seaboard... I'm talkin' AWACS."
: Another comment: "If there was an AWACS on station over
: the targeted area, did it have a Global Hawk capability? I
: mean, could it convert the commercial jets to robotic
: flying missiles?
: A hotly debated question: Who would be in command of such an
: Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS)? Were they
: Chinese -- Russians -- Saudis -- Israelis -- NATO ? All of
: these countries possess AWACS-type aircraft. All (except
: the Saudis) have the capability to utilize electro-magnetic
: pulsing (EMP) to knock out on-board flight controls and
: communications of targeted aircraft, and then, to fly them
: by remote control.
: One of the Air Force officers explained that we had already
: flown a robot plane the size of a Boeing 737 across the
: Pacific to Australia -- unmanned -- from Edwards AF13 in
: California to a successful landing on an Aussie base in
: South Australia. It flies along a pre-programmed flight
: path, but is "monitored" (controlled remotely) by
: a pilot from an outside station.
: He explained that the London Economist (20 Sep 2001) published
: comments from the former CEO of British Airways, Robert
: Ayling, who stated that an aircraft could be commandeered
: from the ground or air and controlled remotely in the event
: of a hijack.
: COMMERCIAL JETS AS GUIDED MISSILES
: An AP story, dateline Brussels - 7 Oct 01 -- "At
: Washington's request, NATO will soon deploy surveillance
: aircraft for anti-terrorist operations in the United States
: in response to the attacks on New York and Washington, NATO
: officials said Sunday, an unprecedented use of foreign
: military forces to defend the U.S. homeland."
: The assembled group of pilots debated why we would ask for
: foreign forces to fly AWACS over our sovereign territory
: when we have a fleet of 33 of them, of which 28 are
: stationed in Oklahoma. The debate also centered on whether
: such NATO surveillance aircraft were already here prior to
: 11 September.
: Could one of them have commandeered the four airliners?
: There seems to be wide discrepancies between what the Federal
: government is proclaiming -- and their media moguls
: reporting -- as opposed to the calm and reasoned and
: rational views of those men who fly the planes and defend
: the nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
: This writer has been a general aviation pilot since 1946. 1
: have flown a variety of single engine prop aircraft since,
: and installed an FAA-approved airstrip here on my farm in
: 1980. Two local pilots periodically joined me for short
: hops; one, a Madison County lawyer, a graduate of the Air
: Force Academy, who flew for the Air Force before coming
: home to practice law.
: The other, Kent Hill, who lives with his wife, Carol, on a
: farm close to mine, is an American Airlines captain
: assigned to the European route. He was a lifelong friend of
: "Chic" Burlingame, They were graduates of the
: Naval Academy and flew F-4 Phantoms in Vietnam. Both left
: the Navy 28 years ago and joined American Airlines. Both
: planned to retire in 2002. Chic was the captain of AA
: flight 77, a Boeing 757, which departed Washington Dulles
: for Los Angeles at 8: 10 am on I I September, with 58
: passengers and a crew of 6. Flight 77 crashed into the
: Pentagon at 9:41 am.
: "We were totally trained on the old type of hijack,"
: Capt Hill said, "where you treat the hijacker
: cordially, punch a 4-digit code into your transponder to
: alert ground control you're being hijacked, and then get
: him where he wants to go, set the plane safely on the
: ground and let them deal with it on the ground. However,
: this is a totally new situation... Not one of the planes
: alerted ground control that they were being hijacked."
: How come?
: "The fact is, all the transponders were turned off on the
: doomed flights virtually at the same time." Look at
: their departure times -- two from Logan (Boston), one from
: Newark, another from Dulles (Washington DC) -- all between
: 8 am and 8:15.
: "Shortly after climb-out to flight level, their
: transponders are de-activated.. (they are no longer a blip
: on the radar screens). This is something that really needs
: to be looked into. The only reason we turn them off is so
: they don't interfere with ground systems when we
: land."
: (Note: Transponders identify a particular aircraft in flight
: on the radar screens of FAA flight controllers located
: throughout the country. Various codes are punched into the
: transponder, one displaying, "I am being
: hijacked.")
: Although there is much talk among the various flight crews,
: Hill says they are not privy to any of the investigations
: into the events of I I September. "We're in the dark
: -- very much so ... They're playing it pretty tight to the
: vest."
: He is convinced none of the pilots had control of their
: aircraft when they were flown into the World Trade Center
: and the Pentagon. The question then becomes, who was really
: in control?
: "Even if I had a gun at my head, I'd never fly a plane
: into a building. I'd try to put it in anywhere -- a field
: or a river --and I'd be scaring the hell out of them (the
: hijackers) by flying upside down first," Hill said.
: In fact, the pilot has the best weapon in his hand when
: threatened with imminent death by a hijacker, namely, the
: airplane.
: Another airline pilot stated. "On hearing a major scuffle
: in the cabin, the pilot should have inverted the aircraft
: and the hijackers end up with broken necks."
: That none of the four pilots executed such a maneuver points
: toward the fact that none of them had control of their
: aircraft, but had been overridden by an outside force,
: which was flying them by remote control.
: As an old and not so bold pilot, I became more convinced that
: the four commercial jets were choreographed by a
: "conductor" from a central source, namely an
: airborne warning and control system (AWACS). They have the
: electronic capability to engage several aircraft
: simultaneously, knock out their on-board flight controls by
: EMP (electro-magnetic pulsing) and assume command and
: remote control of these targeted aircraft.
: As we consider all the options -- and enemies -- who performed
: this act of war, whether from China, Russia, an
: Islamic country, or from NATO, we must also consider that
: the enemy may be within the gates.
: If so, then we are dealing with high treason.
SEARCH EMAIL CHAT CONTACT US MAIN CHEMTRAIL ARCHIVE ARCHIVE ARK UFOS
Comparison Shop
Kosmos Hits Since January 1999
Copyright © 1999 - 2001 Kosmos Ltd. Kosmos Webpage Design, Kosmic Kreations, Kosmos Klub, Dark Matters News, Kosmos Dark Matters. All counter data is password protected for spinners eyes only. The counter on this site is a simple counter and your privacy is protected. DMN does not deposit cookies on your machine. Free cookie cleaner click here. Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of Kosmos Dark Matters or Dark Matters News. We are not responsible for the content at any of the external sites that we link to, including sponsors, and therefore the content is not necessarily endorsed by us.